(* Click on a claim to learn more)

The EVEA Common Interpretive Argument (CIA) was developed over the course of the project through collaborative efforts among state representatives and validity experts. The CIA presents an interactive look at the claims and underlying assumptions that contribute to the validity of an ELPA system. Each claim is linked to a set of possible underlying assumptions that states could test to determine whether each claim holds true for the state’s ELPA system. Users can also link to EVEA materials related to selected claims.